Not a feature list. The four comparisons below are the ones people actually lose sleep over — each with the short answer up front, a full side-by-side, and where I think the cheaper-looking option costs more.
Mortgage insurance that ends vs. lasts the life of the loan — worth more over ten years than the rate gap.
The short answerFHA wins under a 680 score. Conventional wins at 700+, because PMI cancels at 20% equity and FHA MIP does not.
One leaves your first mortgage alone. The other re-prices your entire balance.
The short answerIf you are sitting on a low first mortgage rate, a line of credit protects it. A refinance moves everything to today’s rate.
Same house, two different loans — and rental income only counts on one of them.
The short answerSecond home: from 10% down, near-primary pricing, rent cannot help you qualify. Investment: more down, higher rate, rent counts.
For self-employed borrowers whose tax returns understate what they actually earn.
The short answerConventional reads net profit after write-offs. A bank statement loan reads your deposits instead.
More comparisons get added as the questions come up. If the decision you are weighing is not here, ask me directly — I would rather answer it than have you guess.
Every one of these comparisons has a version where the obvious answer is wrong. FHA looks cheaper until you price mortgage insurance that never comes off. A cash-out refinance looks simpler until it re-prices the low rate you are already carrying. A second home looks better than an investment loan until you realize the rent cannot help you qualify.
That is the whole reason these pages exist. I would rather you read the tradeoff here, for free, than find it in underwriting.
— Brian Marchand, Sr. Loan Consultant · NMLS #481563 · call or text me